Mr. Zekowski is always on top of his game. If you developed melanoma after taking Viagra (sildenafil), you may have grounds for civil action. Viagra and Melanoma. The connection between Viagra and melanoma has been known since 2014, when a study found that men who took Viagra were 84 percent more likely to develop the skin cancer than those who did not take the pill. However, the outcomes of any Viagra bellwether trials will not be binding on any other claims other than the one considered by the jury.Following the coordinated discovery and litigation in the MDL, if Pfizer fails to reach While there are currently only a few hundred lawsuits over Viagra pending nationwide, it is ultimately expected that several thousand men diagnosed with melanoma following use of the medication may be included in the litigation.Increasing evidence suggests that the drug maker placed their desire for profits before consumer safety, withholding information from consumers and the medical community.Provide contact information below and additional private comments if you want an attorney to contact you to review a potential case.This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.CONTACT OUR LAWYERS ABOUT A VIAGRA CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT An earlier study created a bit of a scare for male sun lovers. This deadly skin cancer can start as a new growth or develop from existing moles that suddenly change color, size or shape.Men who are taking or have taken Viagra for erectile dysfunction, should be aware of the signs and early symptoms of melanoma. The study authors concluded that “the results from a well-established, long-term cohort study suggest a positive association between PDE5A inhibitor (sildenafil) use for erectile function problems and risk of subsequent melanoma.”While more research is needed to determine if Viagra causes melanoma, evidence shows a causal connection between the two.Melanoma affects some 90,000 people every year. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of California.1 The litigation consists of fourteen actions pending in six districts, as listed on Schedule A. The study discovered that 4.3 men out of every 1,000 who did not use Viagra developed melanoma compared to 8.6 men out of every 1,000 who did use Viagra.At some point later this year, it is anticipated that both the plaintiffs’ team and Pfizer will have identified their prospective experts. However, the outcomes of any Viagra bellwether trials will not be binding on any other claims other than the one considered by the jury.Following the coordinated discovery and litigation in the MDL, if Pfizer fails to reach While there are currently only a few hundred lawsuits over Viagra pending nationwide, it is ultimately expected that several thousand men diagnosed with melanoma following use of the medication may be included in the litigation.Increasing evidence suggests that the drug maker placed their desire for profits before consumer safety, withholding information from consumers and the medical community.Provide contact information below and additional private comments if you want an attorney to contact you to review a potential case.This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.CONTACT OUR LAWYERS ABOUT A VIAGRA CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT

Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. April 2016 — Federal judges have centralized all federal Viagra lawsuits involving melanoma (skin cancer) into a Multi-District Litigation (MDL No. Plaintiffs in MDL Allege Viagra and Melanoma ConnectionA total of 429 men are currently plaintiffs in an MDL (multidistrict litigation) lawsuit that is consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the California Northern District. However, unlike a class action for Viagra, where each claim would be litigated together through one class representative, each case in the MDL will remain an individual action and each plaintiff must establish that their melanoma diagnosis was caused by Pfizer’s failure to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug. This MDL was established in San Francisco federal court before Judge Seeborg and styled as In Re: Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation. Known as an MDL, or multidistrict litigation, the proceedings will be managed similar to a Viagra melanoma class action. The long-term observational study included 26,000 men who were tracked over a decade. Plaintiffs in MDL Allege Viagra and Melanoma Connection Viagra May Cause Melanoma. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) issued an The cases will all be centralized before U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg as part of an MDL, which is designed to reduce duplicative discovery into common issues, avoid conflicting pretrial rulings from different courts and to serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses and the judicial system.In complex pharmaceutical litigation, where a large number of claims are likely to be filed by users of the same medication, who have suffered similar injuries, it is common for the courts to centralize pretrial proceedings is manner. Amanda Burbank June 12, 2017 Last summer, according to the July 15 statistics from the U.S. In Spring of 2016, Viagra skin cancer lawsuits were centralized in California District Court before Judge Richard Seeborg. Understand Melanoma. My phone calls were always returned quickly and all of my questions were answered in a thorough manner.