I thought to pose the question since Facebook’s General Counsel has now Facebook was reportedly initially reluctant to share the Russian ads with congressional investigators citing the Stored Communications Act (SCA). Veuillez remplir les champs obligatoires

Quel est le meilleur moment pour vous appeler ? Advertisements and viral posts are, by their nature, communications that are broadcast for public consumption and are not akin to the private subscriber messages that Facebook is required by law to protect.The impact of the SCA on Facebook’s disclosure of information about Russian advertisements and other activities is likely quite limited for several reasons. Veuillez remplir les champs obligatoires Vous payez en fonction des résultats (par exemple, lorsque des utilisateurs cliquent sur le lien vers votre site Web ou vous appellent).Appelez-nous pour recevoir l’aide d’un expert Google Ads


Faites-vous connaître auprès des clients qui souhaitent trouver des entreprises comme la vôtre via la recherche Google et sur Maps. Google's free service instantly translates words, phrases, and web pages between English and over 100 other languages. This was a smart calculation of legal risk. De plus, nous vous aiderons à améliorer vos annonces au fil du temps afin d'obtenir les meilleurs résultats possibles pour votre entreprise. Please address whatever dimensions of these questions you think would help inform Congress, tech companies, the news media, and the public.How could the Stored Communications Act (SCA) prohibit Facebook from providing Congress with the “Russian Ads” one day, but permit it the next? Strong pressure from Democratic Senators and public pressure, as now evidenced by tens of thousands of As long as the demand for information refers to paid advertising, these are political communications under the FEC’s The proposed Honest Ads bill would make these and all other paid political advertisements disclosed in a public database, just as television ads are, but more efficiently, and like those ads, in principle there is no reason for any paid political advertising to remain undisclosed.One option is that the congressional committees issued a subpoena for the information.

Second, the advertisements delivered via Facebook would likely fall outside the scope of protected “communication[s] in electronic storage.” And third, any non-content information (the name, address, or location) about the use of Facebook by Russian “front” pages could be disclosed to the public under § 2702(c)(6) and to congressional investigators as permitted under § 2702(c)(3) and § 2703(c).



Usually there is significant political upside for a social media company to firmly and publicly say “No” to the government. Votre annonce peut être diffusée sur Google au moment précis où un internaute recherche des produits et services que vous proposez. If democracy can’t survive a $100K buy of manipulative or misleading ads, we’ve got bigger problems than Russia.Another issue is whether the Stored Communications Act (SCA) prohibits Facebook from disclosing these messages to Congress or others. Long before this most recent controversy the status of advertising under the SCA was a source of contention.In Congressional testimony from 2015 the Federal Trade Commission revealed that they often had difficulty in obtaining communications in very similar circumstances: in cases of possibly fraudulent advertising on bulletin board services like Craigslist.

S’inscrire à des cours de danse tous niveaux Définissez un plafond budgétaire mensuel et ne le dépassez jamais. École de danse Google permet aux consommateurs d'effectuer des recherches pour choisir où aller, quoi faire ou quoi acheter. Whereas a warrant is required for content stored 180 days or less, the SCA permits investigators to compel production of content by subpoena if the data has been stored for more than 180 days.

However, I don’t think that serving ads qualifies as an activity of an “electronic communication service.”  Intuitively, ads are intended to be public, they are not intended to be confidential communications to specific, identified parties, such as email, messages, or posts. Veuillez remplir les champs obligatoires The right to engage in political speech free from undue government scrutiny is a core guarantee of both the First Amendment and human rights law.

As a global company we expect Facebook to uphold these human rights norms – the next country to demand information on political speech might be Russia or another country with a poor human rights record. Even if the messages are protected by the SCA, who is going to prosecute or sue for disclosure to Congress? Nevertheless, I think the SCA likely covers the copies of the ads that Facebook retains.

Congressional efforts to resolve these types of questions – including a bill passed unanimously in the House of Representatives in both 2016 and 2017 – have yet to bear fruit.Facebook must also be aware of the broader concerns that come with Congress’s request for these ads.

Vous pouvez par ailleurs mettre en veille ou ajuster vos dépenses à tout moment. Recevez plus d'appels téléphoniques Otherwise, every routine communications from Facebook operations to its user base–welcome mails, how to mails, new feature notices, update notices, security warnings—would be covered by the SCA and subject to disclosure restrictions. Attirez plus de clients grâce à des annonces professionnelles qui aident les utilisateurs à localiser votre entreprise. Gérez vos annonces où que vous soyez.
Vous pouvez aussi nous appeler afin de recevoir une aide gratuite pour configurer votre compte. I would argue that it is not.

I don’t think this is the intent of the SCA.Facebook is not unreasonable to worry that revealing political advertising could violate the Stored Communications Act. But even targeted ads are not 1:1 communications. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance pour créer un compte Google Ads, veuillez remplir ce formulaire et nous ferons de notre mieux pour vous répondre dans les 2 jours ouvrés.