Commentary PPI Litigation—Why These Lawsuits Are Like No Other In most mass tort cases there is a distinct injury or injuries established from the … However, clinical research performed in 2010 revealed concerns over the possible risks of long term PPI use.

The court said it questioned the reliability of the expert testimony and said without it, the plaintiffs could not establish their cases. Mitchell’s physician prescribed an antibiotic.According to the complaint, “Defendants marketed and sold Prilosec OTC but failed to adequately warn users of certain dangers which defendants knew or should have known were the result of using Prilosec OTC.”The district court dismissed the omeprazole lawsuit without prejudice in March 2010 to allow Mitchell to plead his claims under the Ohio Product Liability Act.Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.If you found our resources and information helpful, please take a minute to review us on We appreciate your feedback.

“Given the widespread use of PPIs and their defective nature, it is likely that additional claimants will be harmed by the medications and additional similar actions will be filed in or removed to federal courts in the future,” Paul J. Pennock, Esq., of Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., said in the plaintiffs’ motion.The U.S. Please contact us today. However, the company trained its salespeople to push it for treatment of all forms of the condition, according to the In February 2015, AstraZeneca agreed to pay $20 million to consumers in a Prilosec and Nexium class action lawsuit that had lasted for 10 years. In the thousands of claims filed against drug companies, these arguments are made:If you think you have suffered harm from taking PPIs, you may want to talk to a drug defect attorney today.Because PPIs are popular and often prescribed, millions of people are at serious risk of suffering serious health problems, including kidney damage, Even if there have been no PPI settlements yet, it still is wise to get started on the lawsuit or claim process so that you are eligible when and if a settlement agreement is reached in the MDL case mentioned above.If you qualify, you could be eligible for compensation for your medical expenses, lost earnings, pain and suffering, future medical costs, and even punitive damages.For more information about filing a PPI lawsuit, please contact our law office today. This is partially because AstraZeneca did not provide safety information to healthcare professionals.

The two drugs were almost chemically identical, but Nexium was far more expensive than Prilosec.Consumers alleged the company’s marketing campaign tricked consumers into buying the more expensive Nexium rather than Prilosec, even though the drugs have the same effect.In 2008, the pharmaceutical company won a similar case over the Prilosec and Nexium marketing in which pharmacies like Walgreens and Rite Aid sued it for violating antitrust laws.

There is NO OBLIGATION in Ongoing Proton Pump Inhibitor Litigation. Although the drugs are almost the same chemically, Nexium was marketed as an improved drug, but was much more expensive.AstraZeneca was accused of creating a shady sales campaign to make sure their product line appeared ‘new’ and would continue to rake in profits. It claimed the drug led to a woman’s bone fractures.A federal court panel combined 47 lawsuits. That class action lawsuit was settled for $20 million.As of 2018, there were more than 4,000 personal injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits pending in federal court.

The study was done by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, and was published in 2017 in Kidney International.It studied PPI use in 125,000 patients and showed that more than 50% of patients who develop kidney damage while taking Prilosec (The study showed that the start of acute kidney problems among PPI users is not a good indication for doctors to look for a decline in kidney function.
If you’ve been injured, you may have the right to file a lawsuit, as well. They found that 80% of PPI users did not develop acute kidney problems.
Get a free case review today to find out if you are eligible.Drugwatch content is legally reviewed for accuracy and quality.Examples of trusted legal reviewers include qualified mass torts lawyers and certified paralegals.Drugwatch writers gather lawsuit information by studying court records, watching lawsuit proceedings and speaking with experienced attorneys.More than 15,000 PPI lawsuits have been filed against the manufacturers of prescription versions of Nexium, Prilosec, Prevacid, Protonix and Dexilant — as well as over-the-counter Prilosec OTC, Nexium 24HR and Prevacid 24HR.The lawsuits argue that manufacturers didn’t do enough to warn patients and medical professionals about the possible risks as the companies became aware of them. Thousands of proton-pump inhibitor lawsuits have been filed by patients. The class action claimed the company spent $260 million on an advertising campaign to mislead consumers into buying more expensive medicine. It assigned U.S. District Judge Claire C. Cecchi to oversee the proceedings.Hundreds of consumers filed lawsuits against AstraZeneca, alleging In 2011, Ginny Begin of Toledo, Ohio, filed a lawsuit against AstraZeneca that claimed the pharmaceutical company was aware of the risk of fractures but did not inform Nexium users.